top of page

The Cost of Non-Compliance: Why Erosion and Sediment Control Matters

In recent news, the Coastal GasLink (CGL) project has been hit with substantial fines totaling $346,000 due to issues related to erosion and sediment control during the construction of a natural gas pipeline in British Columbia. This incident underscores the critical importance of compliance with environmental regulations, as non-compliance can lead to severe financial penalties. Today we will delve into why being compliant for erosion and sediment control is vital, primarily due to the major fines imposed for not adhering to these regulations.

Pipeline Construction

The Costly Consequences of lacking Erosion Control Compliance:

The fines imposed on Coastal GasLink by B.C.'s Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) are a direct result of what the EAO described as "repeated non-compliance" with environmental requirements. These fines send a clear message about the seriousness of failing to meet erosion and sediment control standards.

According to the CBC News article, one significant fine of $340,000 was issued for "deficiencies with erosion and sediment control measures" discovered during inspections in April and May of 2022. It is important to note that these inspections occurred before Coastal GasLink signed a compliance agreement, indicating that violations had been ongoing before corrective measures were put in place. This fine was not an isolated incident, as the company had already faced three previous penalties amounting to over $450,000 for similar violations in the past year and a half.

Additionally, a $6,000 fine was imposed for "providing false and misleading information" regarding maintenance inspection records in October 2022. While Coastal GasLink claimed this was an unintentional error due to an "administrative contractor record discrepancy," it highlights the need for strict adherence to accurate record-keeping in environmental compliance.

A History of Non-Compliance:

Since the initiation of the Coastal GasLink project in 2019, the EAO has issued more than $800,000 in fines, 59 warnings, and 30 orders, including 13 stop-work orders. These figures demonstrate the recurring nature of non-compliance issues and the persistent violations of erosion and sediment control requirements.

Improvements and Remaining Challenges:

Coastal GasLink stated that they took "immediate and decisive action" to address sediment and erosion control concerns when identified. However, the repeated fines and warnings indicate that these issues were not resolved effectively in their initial stages.

The EAO acknowledged that Coastal GasLink has made improvements in its management of erosion and sediment control, particularly under EAO oversight. However, it emphasized that challenges persist, as evidenced by significant issues during wet weather in spring 2023.

Conclusion: The Coastal GasLink case serves as a stark reminder of the substantial fines and penalties that can be levied for non-compliance with erosion and sediment control regulations. Ensuring compliance with environmental requirements is not just a matter of avoiding financial penalties; it is also crucial for protecting the environment and maintaining the integrity of construction projects.

Construction companies, like Coastal GasLink, must prioritize adherence to erosion and sediment control measures from the outset of their projects. This not only reduces the risk of fines but also promotes responsible environmental stewardship. Failing to do so can result in financial setbacks, damage to reputation, and potential harm to the ecosystem.


CBC News. (September 21, 2023). "Coastal GasLink fined $346K for erosion, sediment control issues in B.C. pipeline construction." Retrieved from

14 views0 comments


bottom of page